11/2/2022 0 Comments Parallels 13 vs vmware fusion 8.5![]() ![]() That’s about 16 percent less than the roughly 8 hours that we could expect from running a similarly demanding test natively in OS X. For example, we achieved an average time of 6 hours and 43 minutes while running the lightweight productivity test in Boot Camp. PARALLELS 13 VS VMWARE FUSION 8.5 SOFTWAREIt should first be noted that Windows running in Boot Camp isn’t as energy efficient as OS X natively, due to the fact that Apple, which makes its own hardware, can fine-tune and optimize every aspect of hardware and software to maximize battery life. All tests were performed with the MacBook’s screen set to 50 percent brightness and no other apps open except for the Powermark suite in the Windows VM and our Automator script in OS X. The results reported for each test, below, are measured in minutes, so longer bars are better. The results from this test should give you a good idea of how long your MacBook’s battery will last while running more demanding apps in your virtual machines. The Entertainment test, on the other hand, is much harder on the battery, with tasks like video playback and entry-level 3D gaming. It should be relatively light on our Mac’s battery and offer usable running time when out and about. ![]() The productivity benchmark is likely to be the most common usage scenario for a real user’s virtual machine, and tests activities like Web browsing and office apps. We ran two Powermark benchmarks: Productivity and Entertainment. With this method, which has virtually no impact on battery life, we get a reliable result of total running time that has, at most, a 30-second margin of error. PARALLELS 13 VS VMWARE FUSION 8.5 MACWe then ran our Powermark tests until the battery was drained, plugged the Mac back in, booted up, and calculated the total running time based on the difference between the first and last timestamp in the file generated by Automator. ![]() Using a basic Automator workflow, we told the script to simply write a timestamp to a text file on the OS X desktop once every 30 seconds. We therefore turned to our old standby for measuring battery life in OS X: Automator. Powermark has its own internal battery life calculator that reports both actual running time and estimated battery life remaining, but we didn’t want to take the chance that the virtualization process could introduce inaccuracies in that counter. Unlike PCMark, however, which runs a particular scenario just three times in order to determine a system’s performance level, Powermark runs the designated usage scenario repeatedly until the battery is drained. To test that question, we turned to Futuremark Powermark, a battery life benchmark for Windows that’s based on tests similar to those conducted by its sister app, PCMark. We obviously expect that our MacBook will experience shorter running times when using a virtual machine in OS X, but the question is how much shorter. Although energy efficiency and battery capacity have improved dramatically in recent years, it still takes a lot of power to run a complex modern operating system, and with any of the virtualization platforms we’re looking at today, we’re asking our MacBook to go even further and run two operating systems (at least!). With the ever increasing use of laptops and mobile computing devices, battery life is one of the most important areas of product development and the customer experience. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |